DM field reordering: unexpected behaviour when moving nested fields

Description

CAPL - Bug default text according to the team DoR (Definition of Ready)

01 - PERSON OF CONTACT (PERSON THAT CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PROBLEM):
02 - PROBLEM (WHAT'S THE ISSUE?):

When you change the position of a nested field, the children are left behind, as if they were children of the new field in that position. After saving, it displays correctly once again.

03 - STEPS TO REPRODUCE (STEP (1...N), VIDEO, SCREENSHOTS, LOGS FOLDER, HEARTBEAT, ETC. – IF IS NOT POSSIBLE TO REPRODUCE EXPLAIN THE REASON):
04 - LINKS (ADD A LINK TO THE BUG OR TO THE TENANT):
05 - EXPECTED BEHAVIOR (LIST THE EXPECTED BEHAVIORS TO CONSIDER THIS BUG AS DONE):

Activity

Automation for Jira 22 January 2024, 22:09 Jira Internal Users

This issue was automatically transitioned to REGRESSION, as its PR was just merged into qa branch in Github.

Automation for Jira 22 January 2024, 22:08 Jira Internal Users

This issue was automatically transitioned to REGRESSION, as its PR was just merged into qa branch in Github.

Automation for Jira 22 January 2024, 22:08 Jira Internal Users

This issue was automatically transitioned to REGRESSION, as its PR was just merged into qa branch in Github.

Automation for Jira 22 January 2024, 22:08 Jira Internal Users

This issue was automatically transitioned to REGRESSION, as its PR was just merged into qa branch in Github.

Automation for Jira 22 January 2024, 22:08 Jira Internal Users

This issue was automatically transitioned to REGRESSION, as its PR was just merged into qa branch in Github.

Automation for Jira 22 January 2024, 22:08 Jira Internal Users

This issue was automatically transitioned to REGRESSION, as its PR was just merged into qa branch in Github.

Automation for Jira 22 January 2024, 22:08 Jira Internal Users

This issue was automatically transitioned to REGRESSION, as its PR was just merged into qa branch in Github.

Automation for Jira 22 January 2024, 22:08 Jira Internal Users

This issue was automatically transitioned to REGRESSION, as its PR was just merged into qa branch in Github.

Automation for Jira 22 January 2024, 19:01 Jira Internal Users

@Carlos Affonso Wagner ,
@Jonathan Willian Moraes , @Chámam Diomede Caires , @Ingo Wagner

This issue was planned to be delivered until 2024-02-12. You can check that by consulting the issue in the Due Date field.

Dates already planned for this issue: 2024-01-23, 2024-02-12, 2024-01-02

If External Issue Link field is filled, customer was also informed on JIRA TOTVS.

Automation for Jira 16 January 2024, 22:15 Jira Internal Users

This issue was automatically transitioned to TESTED & MERGED, as its PR was just merged into develop branch in Github. PR Approved by felabs01.

Automation for Jira 15 January 2024, 15:13 Jira Internal Users

This issue was automatically transitioned to QA REVIEW, as its PR was just approved in Github.

Automation for Jira 14 January 2024, 21:05 Jira Internal Users

This issue was automatically transitioned to REVIEW, as its PR (not DRAFT and not WIP) was just created in Github.

fix(DM): https://totvslabs.atlassian.net/browse/CAPL-5090#icft=CAPL-5090 reordering nested fields

Automation for Jira 2 January 2024, 18:33 Jira Internal Users

@Carlos Affonso Wagner ,
@Geny Isam Hamud Herrera ,

This issue was planned to be delivered until 2024-01-22. You can check that by consulting the issue in the Due Date field.

Dates already planned for this issue: 2024-01-22, 2024-01-02

If External Issue Link field is filled, customer was also informed on JIRA TOTVS.

Automation for Jira 11 December 2023, 19:39 Jira Internal Users

@Carlos Affonso Wagner ,
@Pedro Buzzi ,

This issue was planned to be delivered until 2024-01-01. You can check that by consulting the issue in the Due Date field.

Dates already planned for this issue: 2024-01-01

If External Issue Link field is filled, customer was also informed on JIRA TOTVS.