As an user I should not inform the staging table name when adding TOTVS connectors (Protheus, RM, and Datasul)
Description
PRDE - Story default text according to the team DoR (Definition of Ready)
02 - PROBLEM (WHAT'S THE CURRENT PROBLEM SCENARIO OR PAIN TO BE RESOLVED?):
- We should not show the input field “Staging Table Name” when creating TOTVS (RM, Protheus, and Datasul) connectors.
06 - ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA:
When adding a new TOTVS connector, we should not show “Staging Table Name” parameter.
When confirming the creation of a TOTVS connector, we should not show the fields “staging table name” and “crosswalkField“.
Activity
Show:
Details
Priority
HighAssignee
Carlos Affonso Wagner
Reporter
MARCOS STUMPF
Labels
CAROL_BACKLOG_REVIEWPLANNED
Due Date
12 February 2024
Fix versions
CAPL_3.99
Components
CONNECTOR | STAGING_TABLE
Created
18 January 2024, 09:37
Updated
21 February 2024, 10:36
More fields
Created: 18 January 2024, 13:37
Updated:
21 February 2024, 14:36
This issue was automatically transitioned to REGRESSION, as its PR was just merged into qa branch in Github.
This issue was automatically transitioned to TESTED & MERGED, as its PR was just merged into develop branch in Github. PR Approved by pedrobuzzi.
DONE
This issue was automatically transitioned to QA REVIEW, as its PR was just approved in Github.
This issue was automatically transitioned to REVIEW, as its PR (not DRAFT and not WIP) was just created in Github.
chore(connector): https://totvslabs.atlassian.net/browse/CAPL-5317#icft=CAPL-5317 TOTVS connectors create flow changes
@MARCOS STUMPF ,
@Jonathan Willian Moraes ,
@Geny Isam Hamud Herrera ,
This issue was planned to be delivered until 2024-02-12. You can check that by consulting the issue in the Due Date field.
Dates already planned for this issue: 2024-02-12
If External Issue Link field is filled, customer was also informed on JIRA TOTVS.