@Parsa Shiva

I would leave this task. Still research have to be made to check if/how we can integrate with project roles.

@Krzysztof Bogdan In that case, should I create a feature request for this instead or withdraw this task and leave it at that?

@Parsa Shiva Interesting. I have few ideas but I would wait if clients request that.

@Krzysztof Bogdan So, please have a look at my comment

ESFJ-684: Investigate team-managed permission schemes compatibilityGathering Interest

@Parsa Shiva please assign feature request about JES to @Krzysztof Bogdan(definitely you can mention me)

Hello @Kamil Zarychta,
Task is ready for review.

@Parsa Shiva please make sure reviewer
have easy access to contend to be reviewed.

If this is code change. Please make sure PR is created.
If this is new documentation, blogpost, etc. Please provide link to page.

@Krzysztof Bogdan @Kamil Zarychta

There's a feature similar to permission schemes in team management apps, called "Access." It allows assigning roles such as Admins, Members, and Viewers, with customizable access for each group's actions and views. You can also create custom roles with different names.

In general, access to the project is managed at three levels: Private, Limited, and Open, dictating who can access the project.

If they have an API, I can show you how it works. It might be a good feature to consider for our roadmap.